![]() ![]() ![]() (3,6,7) Typically, the difference in the theoretical OER overpotential among different catalysts has been correlated to a single descriptor following the above-mentioned Sabatier principle, namely, the oxygen adsorption energy on the catalyst surface (4) and it has been postulated that scaling relations exist between adsorption energies of the oxygenated intermediate binding species. ![]() (3) Figure 2 shows an example of the conventional OER mechanism, in the sense that it is likely the most widespread used to describe the OER, for the acidic and the alkaline environment, respectively. Several reaction mechanisms having the metal centers as active sites have been proposed in the past. (3) However, the design of optimal catalysts first calls for a better understanding of the electrochemical reaction mechanisms, particularly the one related to the anodic OER and for a rationalization of the reasons behind the often observed changes in the catalyst’s electrochemical activity (either as positive or negative trend) during operation. From the point of view of speeding up the widespread market penetration of water electrolyzers, the development of a highly active, stable, and inexpensive electrocatalyst is highly demanded. Therefore, still open questions and great challenges orbit around the OER. (3) Neither the reaction mechanism nor the ideal catalyst in terms of activity and stability has been revealed so far. Even though the electrochemical splitting of water has been known since the 19th century when Paets van Troostwijk/Deiman and Nicholson/Carlisle made one of the most exciting scientific discoveries ever made, unveiling that electricity can decompose water into hydrogen and oxygen (see Figure 1), the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), that is, the anodic reaction of water electrolyzers, is still an enigma. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |